Internet censorship in the United Kingdom. Internet censorship in the United Kingdom is conducted under a variety of laws, judicial processes, administrative regulations and voluntary arrangements. It is achieved by blocking access to sites as well as the use of laws that criminalise publication or possession of certain types of material. These include English defamation law, the Copyright law of the United Kingdom. However, there is a broad sweep of exceptions. The law provides for freedom of speech and press, and prohibits arbitrary interference with privacy, family, home, or correspondence, and the government routinely respects these rights and prohibitions. An independent press, an effective judiciary, and a functioning democratic political system combine to ensure freedom of speech and press. There are no government restrictions on access to the Internet. Individuals and groups routinely use the Internet, including e- mail, to express a wide range of views. Meet people online through social dating matches based on your interests. Meet people online with similar interests to yourself. Explore Canoodle, the social dating. H-YPE is a UK based herpes dating site set among a real sense of community and support. The name H-YPE is an acronym for H-Your Positive Experience. Below is a complete list of all Dating Sites and Dating Apps that have been reviewed. They are sorted alphabetical. You can use the dropdown control to view our. National security concerns, the need to fight terrorism and crime, and issues regarding child protection have resulted in the state introducing extensive surveillance measures over online communications as well as filtering and tracking practices. In some cases these are encouraged or required by the state and used by state agencies. 100 Free Dating Sites In United KingdomIn others they are voluntarily implemented by private operators (e. The filtering program has applied to new ISP customers since the end of 2. A voluntary code of practice agreed by all four major ISPs. The range of content blocked by ISPs can be varied over time. Their Home. Safe internet filtering system was introduced in May 2. March 2. 01. 2. Home. Safe was praised by Cameron and is controlled and operated by the Chinese company Huawei. Some smaller ISPs expressed their reluctance to take part in filtering, citing concerns over costs and civil liberties. Nevertheless, the ISP Andrews and Arnold does not censor any of its Internet connection all its broadband packages guarantee a 1. At that point the Big 4 major fixed- line ISPs comprised 9. They were all mandating filters be enabled as default for new customers, but overall take- up figures were low, with BT (5%), Sky (8%) and Virgin (4%). The figure was higher for Talk. Talk (3. 6%) as there had already been significant take- up of its system during the preceding three years. Those customers who ignore the email have the filter turned on automatically. David Cameron first announced such legislation in July 2. Labour said that it would introduce mandatory filters based on BBFC ratings if it believed that voluntary filtering by ISPs had failed. These rules require that all internet traffic has to be treated equally, without blocking or slowing down certain data. Net neutrality guidelines were announced in August 2. Body of European Regulators of Electronic Communications. John Carr of the UK Council for Child Internet Safety said of the proposals: 'a major plank of the UK’s approach to online child protection will be destroyed at a stroke'. Legitimate sites are regularly blocked by the filters of some UK ISPs and mobile operators. In January 2. 01. UKCCIS began constructing a whitelist of the charity- run educational sites for children that had been overblocked. The intention was to provide the list to ISPs to allow unblocking. The tool revealed that 1. ISPs) although the percentage of sites hosting legal pornographic material is thought to be around 4%. The government believes that . I think it is very important that it's the ISPs that come up with solutions to protect children. This creates the potential for them to be expanded to stifle dissent for political ends, as has happened in some other countries. Cameron has insisted that Internet users will have the option to turn the filters off, but no legislation exists to ensure that option will remain available. The discussion was titled . The panel included government representatives such as Member of Parliament Claire Perry, members of the press, and supporters of an open Internet such representatives from the UK Council for Child Internet Safety, the Family Online Safety Institute, and Big Brother Watch. Rather than protect children from things like bullying and online predators, these filters leave children in the dark. New Statesman magazine observed that overblocking means “the most vulnerable people in society are the most likely to be cut off from the help they need”. All major UK operators now voluntarily filter content by default and when users try to access blocked content they are redirected to a warning page. This tells them that they are not able to access an 'over 1. Internet site and a filtering mechanism has restricted their access. Categories that are listed as blocked include: adult / sexually explicit, chat, criminal skills, drugs, alcohol and tobacco, gambling, hacking, hate, personal and dating, violence, and weapons. The Open Rights Group also demonstrated that correcting the erroneous blocking of innocent sites can be difficult. No UK mobile operator provides an on- line tool for identifying blocked websites. The O2 Website status checker. An additional opt- in whitelist service aimed at users under 1. O2. The service only allows access to websites on a list of categories deemed suitable for that age group. The filtering is done voluntarily by the six largest providers of public Wi- Fi: Arqiva, BT, Sky, Nomad Digital, Virgin and O2, who together are responsible for 9. Wi- Fi. Pressure from the Government and the UK Council for Child Internet Safety. Research in September 2. Religious sites were blocked by nearly half of public Wi- Fi filters and sex education sites were blocked by one third. The filtering was done by third party organisations and these were criticised for being both unidentified and unaccountable. Such blocking may breach the Equality Act 2. The government arranged for the UK Council for Child Internet Safety to investigate whether filters were blocking advice to young people in areas such as sex education. According to research conducted by the Radical Librarians Collective, at least 9. You. Tube, Facebook and Twitter are often filtered by schools. Some universities also block access to sites containing a variety of material. Examples of overblocking exist in the school context. For instance, in February 2. Yes Scotland pro- independence campaign was blocked in a Glasgow school while the rival Better Together pro- union website was not blocked. Hence incitement to ethnic or racial hatred is a criminal offence in the UK and those who create racist websites are liable to prosecution. Incitement to hatred against religions is an offence in England and Wales under the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2. Holocaust denial is not an offence per se unless it contravenes other laws. Other legal exceptions to the principle of freedom of speech include the following: The Counter Terrorism Internet Referral Unit (CTIRU), which was set up in 2. Association of Chief Police Officers and run by the Metropolitan Police Service, maintains a list of sites and content that in their opinion incites or glorifies terrorist acts under Section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2. This list is passed to the public estate institutions so that access to the sites can be blocked. ISPs BT, Sky, Talk. Talk and Virgin Media incorporate the CTIRU block list into their filters. These would allow judges to ban people who are deemed extremists (but who . These include obscenity. It was almost the only liberal democracy not to have legalised hardcore pornography during the 1. Pre- existing laws, such as the Obscene Publications Act 1. Additionally new laws were introduced to extend existing prohibitions. The Video Recordings Act 1. BBFC to censor all video works before release. As a result, the UK became one of the few representative government countries where the sale of explicit pornography on video (and later DVD) was illegal. The existing legal and regulatory framework was seen as insufficient and UK governments have subsequently introduced piecemeal legislation and regulation. Legislation in the form of the Protection of Children Act 1. The R v Bowden case in 2. Internet also contravened the law. In the 1. 99. 0s they began to take a pro- active regulatory role with respect to the Internet, using existing legislation and working on a self- tasking basis. In August 1. 99. 6, the Metropolitan Police Clubs & Vice Unit sent an open letter to the Internet Service Providers Association (ISPA) supplying them with a list of 1. Usenet discussion groups that they believed to contain pornographic images or explicit text and requesting that they ban access to them. Ian Taylor, the Conservative Science and Industry Minister, warned ISPs that the police would act against any company which provided their users with . Following this, a tabloid- style expos. The action of the UK police has been described as amounting to censorship without public or Parliamentary debate. It has been pointed out that the list supplied to ISPs by the police in August included a number of legitimate discussion groups concerned with legal sexual subjects. These contained textual material without pictures that would not be expected to infringe UK obscenity laws. These reports would be passed on to ISPs and the Police as a . It was intended that this arrangement would protect the internet industry from any criminal liability. The IWF was also intended to support the development of a website rating system. Their report was delivered in October 1. DTI, which played a . BT spokesman Jon Carter described Cleanfeed's function as . The proportion of Internet Service Providers using Cleanfeed by the beginning of 2. Moreover, nearly two thirds of the participants did not trust British Telecommunications or the IWF to be responsible for a silent censorship system in the UK. However, no safeguards exist to stop the secret list of blocked sites being extended to include sites unrelated to child pornography. Free Dating Site. They asked me for money & stuff. They didn't get what they want. December 1. 1, 2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
August 2017
Categories |